Finance

Uncategorized

C&I Solar Sector Could See Huge Growth in Next Few Years

Investments in commercial and industrial (C&I) solar energy projects (50kW-2MW) by U.S. corporations are poised to soar, according to a new market research report commissioned by Santa Barbara-based Wiser Capital. More than 60 percent of managers with influence over corporate investments intend to put company capital to work by investing in solar energy in the U.S., according to a survey conducted by OnePoll for Wiser Capital’s “2015 Solar Investment Index. “

 

One-third of corporate managers surveyed said their companies would make their first solar energy investments within the next year. This doesn’t appear to be a “flash in the pan” investment phenomenon either: No less than 83 percent of the 100 small to mid-size company managers surveyed said their commercial organizations will make investing in the solar energy sector a priority by 2020.

 

Aside from contributing to national and international initiatives addressing climate change and environmental resources degradation, the potential to earn comparatively high, stable and longer term returns on investment (ROI) is a primary motivating factor for U.S. corporate investors, Wiser Capital highlights in a press release.

 

“We have known the demand for mid-scale solar investment was growing in the U.S and it’s clear the boom has in fact already begun,” Wiser Capital executive director Nathan Homan stated. “We are certain that investment in solar for commercial businesses will soon be a mainstream venture because investors have new tools and resources at their disposal streamlining and clarifying the process.”

 

Commercial Solar: High Returns, High Profile Investments

 

More than 6 in 10 (63 percent) of U.S. businesses surveyed for Wiser Capital’s “2015 Solar Investment Index” expect investing in solar energy will generate high ROIs.

 

Solar energy investments by high-profile, market leaders such as Google, Apple and Tesla are creating a sense of urgency and forcing U.S. corporations to take a serious look at the solar market, Wiser Capital points out. This being the case, the prospect of solar energy investing becoming genuinely mainstream is not far off.

 

Commercial solar investments can range from investing in the shares of individual solar energy companies, exchange-traded and/or index funds and “yieldcos” (yield companies) to investing in solar energy projects directly, Wiser Capital’s directors of strategic affairs Megan Birney elaborated in an interview.

 

Overcoming Obstacles To Solar Energy Investing

 

Wiser Capital’s latest Solar Investment Index also points out perceived obstacles to investing in solar energy. Lack of standardization and unclear investment policies among corporate investors surveyed has held back nearly half (46 percent) of them from making investments.

 

An inability to accurately and comprehensively assess the various risks of making solar energy investments prevented more than 4 in 10 (43 percent) from committing capital. Nearly one-third (31 percent) held back because they found it difficult to evaluate the viability of individual investments in solar energy.

 

Wiser Capital also identified what would overcome corporate investor hesitations about the solar industry.  Seven of 10 survey participants (69 percent) said they would be more likely to invest in solar this year if there was an easier, standardized means of risk assessment. More than half (54 percent) said they would be likely to make solar investments this year if there was an easier way to find solar energy project partners.

 

For its part, Wiser Capital developed an information systems platform that automates the process of evaluating and carrying out solar energy investments. Key features of the tool include investment-grade financial modeling, a risk rating system, and a Wiser Solar Asset Rating (WSAR) Score. “We are an investment firm. Our software helps us understand the market, and it standardizes and streamlines the investment risk assessment and overall investment process,” Birney said.

 

Lead image: Soaring markets. Credit Shutterstock.

Read More
NewsUncategorized

Listen Up: Charging Your Electric Vehicle

Electric vehicles are great: they’re affordable, great for the environment and low maintenance. And where electric rates are low — or if you have rooftop solar power — EVs are cheaper to drive per mile than gas-powered cars. But you have to think about how you will charge your EV: there are only a few thousand public charging locations in the U.S. compared to 100,000 gas stations.

Read More
Uncategorized

Listen Up: Charging Your Electric Vehicle

Electric vehicles are great: they’re affordable, great for the environment and low maintenance. And where electric rates are low — or if you have rooftop solar power — EVs are cheaper to drive per mile than gas-powered cars. But you have to think about how you will charge your EV: there are only a few thousand public charging locations in the U.S. compared to 100,000 gas stations.

Read More
Uncategorized

Largest Solar Farm in Virginia Just Commissioned by Amazon Web Services

Back in 2012, Amazon received a failing grade from Greenpeace regarding its use of renewable energy to power its cloud centers. Skip a couple years and in 2014 Amazon Web Services (AWS) announced a goal of achieving 100 percent renewable energy usage for its global infrastructure. An announcement today puts it further down the path toward that goal.

AWS announced that it has teamed with Community Energy to support the construction and operation of an 80-MW solar farm in Accomack County, Virginia, which will be named the Amazon Solar Farm US East. The new solar farm is expected to start generating approximately 170,000 megawatt hours (MWh) of solar power annually as early as October 2016.

Amazon Solar Farm US East will be the largest solar farm in the state of Virginia, with all energy generated delivered into the electrical grids that supply both current and future AWS Cloud datacenters.

As of April 2015, AWS global infrastructure was using approximately 25 percent renewable energy and the company announced an interim goal of increasing that percentage to at least 40 percent by the end of 2016. The Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) for Amazon Solar Farm US East follows a similar PPA for Amazon Wind Farm (Fowler Ridge) in Benton County, Indiana, that was announced in January 2015. Both represent key steps toward meeting these goals.

“We continue to make significant progress towards our long-term commitment to power the global AWS infrastructure with 100 percent renewable energy,” said Jerry Hunter, Vice President of Infrastructure at Amazon Web Services. “Amazon Solar Farm US East – the second PPA that will serve both existing and planned AWS datacenters in the central and eastern US – has the added benefit of working to increase the availability of renewable energy in the Commonwealth of Virginia.”

Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe commented, “Amazon’s new solar project will create good jobs on the Eastern Shore and generate more clean, renewable energy to fuel the new Virginia economy. I look forward to working with Amazon and Accomack to get this project online as we continue our efforts to make Virginia a global leader in the renewable energy sector.”

Read More
Uncategorized

A Closer Look at Fossil and Renewable Energy Subsidies

A new study by the International Monetary Fund puts the total cost of fossil fuel subsidies at approximately $10 million a minute globally, when health costs and environmental degradation are included, never mind the effects of a destabilized climate in future centuries.

The most perverse of these subsidies are aimed at finding new reserves of oil, gas and coal, even though it is generally understood that these must be left in the ground if we are to avoid catastrophic irreversible climate change.

When drilling for oil was a start-up industry in the 1890s, it cost today’s equivalent of $500 a barrel to get it out of the ground, according to UC San Diego’s James Hamilton in his study Oil Prices, Exhaustible Resources, and Economic Growth.

The first federal tax break for the oil and gas industry came within its very first years. The Intangible Drilling Costs (IDC) still allows the industry to write off most drilling costs, like the tertiary injectants deduction, in full, immediately, rather than at normal business depreciation rates.

Enacted in 1926, the Percentage Depletion Tax Credit actually increases when prices go up, as it allows companies to deduct a flat percentage of income received from oil or gas wells, frequently resulting in tax deductions in excess of investment.

The Independent Petroleum Association of America describes the tax credit this way: “This deduction is a standard part of the American tax code that supports the development of U.S. oil and natural gas that would otherwise be uneconomic to produce.”

When coal was a start-up industry (in the U.S.) in the late 1700s, it was given tax-free status, smelting was given incentives, and competing old world coal imports were taxed at 10 percent. Four centuries later, coal is still receiving $5 billion in incentives a year. The result is coal-fired electricity at about US $0.04 per kilowatt-hour (when burned in power plants that are already built, the costs of which have already been passed along to ratepayers).

“There are dozens and dozens of tax credits for conventional energy,” said SolarReserve CEO Kevin Smith, based on the knowledge he gained in 30 years of building natural gas plants.  “For example, if the Keystone pipeline goes ahead; the refineries who refine that type of alternative fuel get a 50 percent ITC. There are depreciation allowances for wells as they start to degrade, there are just a long list of tax advantages. And all of them are a permanent part of the tax codes.”

These and other oil and gas subsidies total about $7 billion a year in the U.S., according to Taxpayers for Common Sense Understanding Oil and Gas Tax Subsidies.

For centuries, the U.S. Congress has made these sorts of federal investments in each new form of fossil energy.

Permitting, Leasing Show Inequities, Too

State-level policies increase expenses for renewable energy project developers by making permitting onerous for new projects. In California for example, permitting has historically been almost nonexistent for fossil fuels, but has set a much higher bar for renewable energy.

Permitting solar farms in California can be a three-year multi-million-dollar process. Fossil fuel companies can simply declare on a one page form their intentions to drill next Friday. Further, land leasing costs are higher for solar and wind than for fossil fuels. Land leases for oil and gas were still at 1920s prices in 2009, when the BLM was setting market rates for the renewable industry.

The coal industry pays land rents for natural resource extraction on land that has been undervalued since the 1800s. In the last 30 years, the treasury has lost nearly $30 billion in revenue by undervaluing public lands in Wyoming and Montana where Powder River coal is mined, according to Tom Sanzillo, Finance Director at the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA).

Make Renewable Subsidies Permanent

It is almost impossible to reverse permanent subsidies in the tax code. It has never happened in the U.S., so some advocates believe that a more practical solution would be: if you can’t beat them, join them.

The coal industry’s PTC for producing refined coal is $6.71 a ton — in 2015. The wind industry’s $0.023 per kWh PTC keeps flickering out every few years. Renewables have been stymied by stop/start subsidies that almost seem designed to scare off investors, because none are permanently in the tax code the way fossil fuel subsidies are.

Uncertainty alone makes subsidies less effective. If the ITC and PTC were permanent, renewable investment would be more predictable, so supplying equipment for projects and capital cost would be less, bringing generation costs down. While some investors are able to stomach the risk of buying into renewables projects without knowing whether the tax credits will still be there when their projects reach fruition, most cannot.

Because subsidies for fossil fuels are permanent, the effect is much greater, because permanence provides a stable and predictable investment environment not given to renewables.

 

One way to create a level playing field with fossil fuels would be make the subsidies for wind and solar just as permanent as those for fossil fuels. Either that, or remove all subsidies for all forms of fuel, something very unlikely to happen.

Read More